Đăng nhập
Đăng nhập
Đăng nhập
Chọn ngôn ngữ

Tafsir: Yusuf 12:25

12:25
واستبقا الباب وقدت قميصه من دبر والفيا سيدها لدى الباب قالت ما جزاء من اراد باهلك سوءا الا ان يسجن او عذاب اليم ٢٥
وَٱسْتَبَقَا ٱلْبَابَ وَقَدَّتْ قَمِيصَهُۥ مِن دُبُرٍۢ وَأَلْفَيَا سَيِّدَهَا لَدَا ٱلْبَابِ ۚ قَالَتْ مَا جَزَآءُ مَنْ أَرَادَ بِأَهْلِكَ سُوٓءًا إِلَّآ أَن يُسْجَنَ أَوْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌۭ ٢٥
وَٱسۡتَبَقَا
ٱلۡبَابَ
وَقَدَّتۡ
قَمِيصَهُۥ
مِن
دُبُرٖ
وَأَلۡفَيَا
سَيِّدَهَا
لَدَا
ٱلۡبَابِۚ
قَالَتۡ
مَا
جَزَآءُ
مَنۡ
أَرَادَ
بِأَهۡلِكَ
سُوٓءًا
إِلَّآ
أَن
يُسۡجَنَ
أَوۡ
عَذَابٌ
أَلِيمٞ
٢٥
その時両人は戸の方で相競い,かの女は後ろからかれの服を引き裂き,かれら両人は,戸口でかの女の夫に出会った。かの女は言った。「あなたの家族(妻)に悪事を行おうとした者には,投獄か痛ましい懲罰の外にどんな応報がありましょう。」

— Ryoichi Mita

Cả hai cùng chạy ra cửa (Yusuf thì muốn thoát thân, còn người phụ nữ kia thì muốn ngăn Y lại). Nữ ta đã kéo rách áo của (Yusuf) từ sau lưng. Cả hai cùng giáp mặt người chồng của nữ ta tại cửa, (lúc đó) nữ ta liền nói: “Đâu là hình phạt dành cho kẻ có ý định xấu với vợ của chàng? Hoặc là hắn phải vào tù hoặc là hắn phải chịu sự trừng phạt đau đớn!”

— Ruwwad Center

Tafsirs
Các lớp
Bài học
Suy ngẫm
Câu trả lời
Qiraat
Hadith
Bạn đang đọc phần chú giải Kinh Qur'an cho nhóm các câu này. 12:25 đến 12:29

Joseph ran towards the door to save himself and Zulaykha also ran after him and caught hold of his shirt from behind. In this chaos the back of his shirt was torn. However, Joseph was able to open the door and came out. It so happened that Zulaykha’s husband was there outside the door. On seeing him, Zulaykha put all the blame on Joseph. She did not hesitate to make a false accusation against a person for whom she had been professing love only a moment earlier. Joseph said that the matter was entirely the opposite of what Zulaykha claimed. Now the question was to decide as to who was in the wrong. No third person was present on this occasion who could have been an eyewitness. At that time a wise person of the household offered good advice. (In all probability this person was already aware of the situation. Moreover, he might have already seen that Joseph’s shirt was torn from behind and not from in front.) He told all those concerned that, in the absence of an eyewitness, circumstantial evidence should be relied upon and the circumstantial evidence was that Joseph’s shirt was a clear proof of the fact that in this case it was not Joseph, but Zulaykha who had made improper advances.